5 Common Mistakes Aspiring Travel Photographers Make (+ How to Avoid Them)

Posted in Articles on May 31st, 2010 by Guest Contributor

Later this week we will be launching a brand new dPS eBook on the topic of Travel Photography (update, this is now launched, you can find it here) – written by travel photographer Mitchell Kanashkevich. This post, written by Mitchell, is the first part of a short series introducing some of the mistakes many new travel photographers make.

As you can gather from the title, this post relates to travel photography. However, I want to note that travel photography is a broad topic and so for most part, the mistakes that I’ll discuss here are actually made by the majority of those of us who are in the beginning of our journey into the world of photography, regardless of the genre we’re involved in.

Because I wanted to go into some detail and to provide some visual examples, we’ve decided to split this post up into two parts. Without further ado, here’s part I and check back for part II tomorrow.

1. Having misconceptions about equipment

The two main misconceptions that we most often have about equipment when we’re starting out in photography are:

  • The latest, greatest gear results in better photos.
  • The gear you have is not good enough because your images are not. In other words you blame the equipment.

A camera doesn’t take the photo, nor does any piece of photographic equipment. Photos are made by you – the photographer. Sure in some very rare cases you might have a technical issue with a camera body or a lens, but for most part that’s not the concern. Most of the essential photographic gear is better than good enough these days, it has been for the last five years or so (with the development of affordable digital SLRs), one just has to know how to use it to its full potential.

My advice here in short is – forget about chasing the latest, greatest stuff. Get out there with what you have, figure out how to get the most out of your equipment, learn when to use one lens over another, when to use a tripod and of course, learn about the basics of photography – setting the aperture, shutter speed and ISO. This might seem like the most obvious advice imaginable, but somehow so many aspiring photographers still think that it’s all about the equipment you have, there’s just nothing further from the truth.

2. Not Researching

When I refer to research, I simply mean gathering as much information as possible about the place you’re traveling to. The best time/season to travel, the DOs and DON’Ts, the modes of transportation – these are the necessities, that we must find out about before every trip in order to have a smooth experience not only as far as photographing, but traveling in general.

Beyond the necessities, when photography is the main focus of your trip, it’s worth finding out as much as possible about what’s visually special in the place you’re going to. Sometimes this isn’t going to be obvious, you might have to dig a little, but when you do, a great number of photographic opportunities arise.

Traditional Vedhic school, Thrissur, India

I’ve chosen to include the image above because the story behind it is a good example of what even simple research can lead to. The photo depicts a Namboodiri boy (priest caste) chanting the Vedhas (which can be described in short ancient Indian bits of wisdom) in a traditional Vedhic school in the town of Thrissur. This place (the school) is not a major attraction, it’s not something that the regular visitor travels to Thrissur for, but to me it provided an incredibly interesting photographic opportunity. Despite the fact that I would have never just wandered in there by random chance, as the school is isolated from the main town, it wasn’t at all hard to find it or gain access to shoot there, it was simply a matter of knowing that it existed.

The reason I knew about it is very simple – I researched and by this I don’t mean that I did something complicated and difficult. I went into the tourist office and chatted to the staff there, telling them that I’m a photographer and that I’m keen to see anything that’s visually interesting and unique in their town. After “picking their brains” for about an hour I got a few bits of useful information and the traditional Vedhic school was one of the places I realised I just had to check out.

3. Not looking beyond the main attraction

A lot of travel destinations have “must see”, “must photograph” main attractions. Sometimes we get so obsessed with getting an image of these attractions that we fail to see the subjects around them which could be equally or even more photographically interesting.

I’ve been guilty of this numerous times in the past and so these days I consciously force myself to look at what else there is to photograph besides the obvious. Sometimes this might even mean that I stay at a place for an extra day or two. I photograph the main attraction and then discover the lesser known yet still photo-worthy subjects. This is how the following image came to be. It was taken in Bromo National park.

Bromo National Park, Java, Indonesia

During my first couple of days I shot what everyone shoots there – the Bromo volcano and the neighbouring mountains, from different viewpoints. On the third day, rather than make my way to another viewpoint from which to photograph the volcano and mountains at sunrise, I decided to purposely focus my attention elsewhere. I rode around the area on a rented motorcycle and noticed the spectacular scene of these horsemen walking in the fog through the surrounding volcanic desert.

4. Not being aware of light

Not being aware of light means that you simply shoot whatever you see in any given lighting conditions without giving much thought to the whole matter. Your results might have impact on the viewer every now and then and they might sometimes reflect what you want to say and how you feel about what you see, but more often than not that won’t be the case.

Being aware of light means that you know there are different kinds of light and that the way your image looks will greatly depend on the light you shoot it in. This of course also means that you can make a conscious effort to photograph in the kind of light which will reflect what you want to say and how you feel about the subject you’re photographing.

Let’s look at a simple example.

Transylvanian countryside, Romania

The landscape in the image above looks beautiful, vibrant and dramatic because it is lit by the golden light during sunrise. I made a conscious decision to photograph in this kind of light because I knew that it would bring the colours present in this scene to life and it would basically “beautify” everything.

The light enabled me to create an image that reflected what I wanted to say – how beautiful Transylvanian countryside is, as well as to communicate the excitement which I felt. Had I photographed the same scene without considering light, I could have very well ended up with something much less dramatic. I would have likely just photographed the landscape the first time I saw it and that was on an overcast day, when the light made everything look rather grey and drab.

5. Avoiding artificial light

As we get a little more familiar with light and begin to develop an understanding of how it effects our photographs, a lot of us tend to move away from using artificial light, especially flashes.

The reason most of us do this is because we don’t have enough knowledge about artificial light. It’s true that the on-camera flash should indeed be avoided at all costs, but it’s not the only available artificial lighting option and avoiding artificial light altogether means you’ll never see what you can achieve with it, which in my opinion is a big mistake.

The artificial lighting tools that I consider a great addition to any serious travel photography enthusiast’s kit are an off camera flash in a softbox and/or a reflector. The reason these tools are great is that they allow you to control the light or to manipulate it. This opens one up to a whole range of creative opportunities or even opportunities to make photographs in situations where it would be impossible to do so otherwise. The following image is a good example of this.

Nomads at a camel fair, Kolayat, Rajasthan, India

The only reason I could make this shot was because I had the artificial light from an off-camera flash in a softbox “assisting” the light from the fire, which on its’ own was no where near strong enough to allow me to make the kind of photo I wanted.

Without getting into too much more detail because of the constraints of a blog post, I will say that artificial light is a very exciting topic. If you’re interested in learning more about it, particularly portable, artificial light in the form of an off-camera flash and a reflector, you can check out my eBook “Seeing the Light”, which was featured here on DPS a while a go. Find out more about Seeing the Light.

Update: check out the continuation of this post – 5 MORE Common Mistakes Aspiring Travel Photographers Make (+ How to Avoid Them) – also check out our new eBook – Transcend Travel: a Guide to Captivating Travel Photography.

Post from: Digital Photography School - Photography Tips.

dpsbook.png

5 Common Mistakes Aspiring Travel Photographers Make (+ How to Avoid Them)


Photographers Wanted for Exposure

Posted in Articles on May 31st, 2010 by Dphotojournal com


International EXPOSURE Photo Contest Deadline is May 31, 2010

EXPOSURE is an international open call for photography. This opportunity is open to photographers of all backgrounds and levels. Rewards and benefits will be given to all who participate. One photographer will be awarded a Manhattan gallery reception and an international publicity campaign. The Grand Prize winner will also receive a choice of $10,000 in cash or 1 year living rent-free in a $1.2 million apartment in NYC.

photographers-wanted

DEADLINE:
May 31, 2010 11:59pm

Details are at:
http://www.artistswanted.org/

The panel of judges, including Photographer Lauren Greenfield, New York Times Photo Editor Maura Foley, MoMA Curator Nora Lawrence and JPG Founders Derek Powazek & Heather Powazek Champ, will choose one photographer for the Grand Prize:

* $10,000 cash or 1-year FREE living at a $1.2 million apartment at The Edge in New York City
* A Manhattan gallery reception
* Airfare & shipping to and from New York City for the event
* International publicity

The public will also cast their vote and the highest rated portfolio will receive the People’s Choice Award:

* $2,000 in cash
* A Manhattan gallery reception
* Airfare & shipping to and from New York City for the event

With support from The Edge, JPG Magazine, Etsy, Resource Magazine, Zipcar, 3rd Ward.

photographers-wanted
Click Here to submit your best work.

For Beginners – Your Camera Explained in Plain English

Posted in Articles on May 30th, 2010 by Elizabeth Halford

Beginner, don’t be dismayed! It can be really easy to understand your camera and how the settings in the exposure triangle work the way they do. This explanation is the way I personally think of my camera as an eye:

  • The sensor in your camera is the brain. It receives data and information.
  • ISO is how sensitive the ‘eye’ is to the light.  The higher the number, the more sensitive the eye.
  • Aperture is like the pupil. The wider it is (the lower the f/stop number), the more light is allowed into the eye. Over exposure is like when you’re inside where your pupils are more dilated to compensate for lower light. When you step outside, everything it too bright and your pupils have to get smaller to compensate for so much light. Then when you go back in, everything is too dark (under exposed) because your eye’s aperture needs a moment to open up and let in the light.
  • Shutter speed is like blinking. The faster it blinks, the less light is allowed in and vice versa.

As painfully simple as this is, it really doesn’t get too much more complicated than that – the explenations just do!

How about everyone else? If you had a total beginner ask you to explain how a camera works, what would you tell them?

Post from: Digital Photography School - Photography Tips.

dpsbook.png

For Beginners – Your Camera Explained in Plain English


Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Posted in Articles on May 30th, 2010 by Dphotojournal com


Last updated (30 May’10):
- Review by SLRGear.com

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM is a standard zoom lens. The lens features 24-70mm at focal length with maximum aperture of 1:2.8. The lens construction has 16 elements in 13 groups and has diagonal angle of view at 74 to 29 degrees. Focus adjustment: Front-focusing method, Closest focusing distance at 1.25 feet with zoom Rotating type and has a filter size of 77mm. The Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM lens weighs 2.1 pounds and it measures 3.3 inches in diameter and 4.9 inches long.

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
Overall Rating: 4 out of 5 stars | Latest Price Info


Expert Reviews

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Reviews

SLRGear.com reviews the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM and writes;
“This new lens does what many pros thought couldn’t be done – replace the previous L-series 28-70 f/2.8 lens with something even better. Extended coverage to an ultra-wide-angle 24mm makes it ideal for digital as well as film shooters, and the optics are even better than before with two Aspherical elements and a totally new UD glass element. It’s now sealed and gasketed against dust and moisture, and a new processing unit makes the AF faster than ever.”
Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

WhatDigitalCamera.com reviews the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM and writes;
“Overall, there is little to fault about Canon’s EF 24-70mm in isolation but when compared against the brand-new Nikkor design it perhaps falls slightly behind in terms of both focusing speed and image quality. “
Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

Wlcastleman.com compares the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM to Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM and writes;
“Very sharp, high contrast images were produced over the widest aperture range. The 24-70 noticeably outperforms the 24-105 at 24mm.”
rating: N/A

Photozone.de reviews the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM and writes;
“Distortions, vignetting and CAs are well controlled. The build quality is superb with only the reverse zoom extension as a minor downside. Even so the 24-70mm range is not all that attractive on APS-C DSLRs (39-112mm) – the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 USM IS is a better and cheaper bet except regarding build quality. “
Rating: 3 out of 5 stars

Photo.net reviews the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM and writes;
“Producing a high quality high speed zoom lens that goes as wide as 24mm is challenging, but the “L” in “Canon 24-70L” assures you of professional quality images, rugged construction, and substantial weather-proofing. The 24mm wide end is wide enough to be dramatic, but the 70mm long end is not long enough for flattering portraits.”
rating: N/A

User Opinions

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM User Reviews

Absolutely Essential | Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
“This lens is Canon’s workhorse and can be used to produce stunning portraits in low light situations and marvelous landscape shots on a Full Frame sensor. Have not had a single issue with this lens. Highly Recommended! “ – by Nathan Lanier

Buy this lens | Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
“I based my decision to purchase this lens because I tend to shoot primarily in low light and indoors, where using an f4 lens is a little tough without a flash or tripod. I don’t like using either, so that extra f-stop makes all the difference. This lens is tack sharp, even at f2.8. It gets even better down to f5.6., Excellent color and contrast, The bokeh in portraits is very smooth, Full time manual focus is available, which is nice to have, Lightning fast auto focus, Versatile zoom range (at least for my needs – your mileage may vary), Solid construction. It’s built like a tank. A huge leap from the 18-55mm kit lens that came with the camera. Overall, this is probably one of the best all-purpose lenses that you can buy. It’s very versatile and useful, with very high quality pictures, which is why so many professionals use this lens. “ – by E. Burd

Buy this lens | Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
“I can’t speak for the 24-105, but you will NOT be disappointed if you decide to go with this lens. I put it on my camera and drained the battery in a hour b/c i could not stop shooting random things around the house. The weight isn’t really that big of an issue on my 40d, you won’t care how heavy it is once you see the results. If you can afford it, dont hesitate in buying it.” – by Anthony J. Poggi

The Perfect Lens, | Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
“I’ve had this lens for almost two years now and I have to say, I have never once regretted purchasing it. It’s the perfect all-purpose lens. I use it for weddings, portrait sessions, and personal use. It’s the one lens I can attach and go with knowing that it will give me anything I need. The focal length is versatile, and wide enough for landscapes but the glass is awesome and gives you a great, sharp portrait for up close use as well. Plus, the macro setting is amazing. Definitely one of my top two lenses and I would buy it over and over again. I could never live without it professionally or personally. “ – by Heather C. Ward

Happily Mounted on my 1Ds Mark III | Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
“I got a Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III late last year and the EF 24-70mm 2.8L USM lens for Christmas.I got the camera for shooting weddings.It was suggested to me that I get a camera that holds two memory cards for weddings in case one card fails.I got the 24-70 mainly for use in weddings,portraits,low light,and landscapes.It is a great multipurpose lens and can be used on just about any subject.It has a large aperture(2.8)for great low light and bokeh(blurred background)shots.It does a great job on all of these photo types.” – by Alan

Love this Lens | Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
“This lens is tack sharp even shooting wide open @ f2.8 really good color satuation and contrast,focus speed is good,and quiet.The lens is a very good portrait lens,with a beutiful bokeh smooth as butter!!If you can afford this lens you should buy it, I don’t feel you will regret it, I sure don’t!! Love my L Glass!!!!” – by Glenn A. Yearout

This is the one | Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
“This lens is simply the best lens at this focal length. Its sharp corner to corner on a 5D Mk II Full Frame Camera. Its not as versatile as the 24-105 f4, but it is sharper at 24mm than the 24-105 f4. (I own both). If you want a top notch studio lens, this is the one. If you are looking for more of a walk around lens when you don’t need the extra stop, save $300 and get the 24-105. Either lens is fantastic and you won’t be disappointed in either. If I had to say one BAD thing about the 24-70 F2.8, is that it is a pretty sizable and ROBUST lens. Its not light and will not fit as well on a camera body in a smaller camera bag as the 24-105. With all that said, the 24-70 is a top of class lens. You will feel like you own something special when you own this lens. “ – by F. Roberts

More user opinions | Write your opinion

Samples

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Sample Photos

- Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Sample Photos @ Mylensdb.com
- Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Sample Photos @ Pixel-peeper.com
- Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Sample Photos @ Photographyreview.com
- Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Sample Photos @ Flickr.com
- Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Sample Photos @ Pbase.com
- Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Sample Photos @ The-digital-picture.com
- Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Sample Photos @ Amazon.com

Manual

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM User Manual

- Download Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM User Manual (PDF – 1.2Mb)

Features & Specifications

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Specifications

The Canon EF 24-70mm standard zoom lens does what many pros thought couldn’t be done–it replaces the L-series 28-70mm f/2.8 lens with something even better. The lens offers extended coverage to an ultra-wide-angle 24mm, making it ideal for digital as well as film shooters. The new processing unit, meanwhile, makes the autofocus (AF) faster than ever. And thanks to the two aspherical elements and a totally new UD glass element, the optics are far superior to the earlier lens. Sealed and gasketed against dust and moisture, the EF 24-70mm lens carries a one-year warranty.

* Focal length: 24-70mm
* Maximum aperture: 1:2.8
* Lens construction: 16 elements in 13 groups
* Diagonal angle of view: 74 to 29 degrees
* Focus adjustment: Front-focusing method
* Closest focusing distance: 1.25 feet
* Zoom system: Rotating type
* Filter size: 77mm
* Dimensions: 3.3 inches in diameter, 4.9 inches long
* Weight: 2.1 pounds

Olympus 50mm f/2.0

Posted in Articles on May 30th, 2010 by Haryono


Last updated (30 May’10):
- Review by WDC

Olympus 50mm f/2.0 is a medium macro lens. The lens features 50mm at focal length with maximum aperture of f/2.0. The lens construction has 11 elements in 10 groups, including 1 ED glass element and has diagonal angle of view at 24 degrees. Closest focusing distance at 9.45 inches and has a filter size of 52mm. The Olympus 50mm f/2.0 lens weighs 10.6 ounces and it measures 2.8 inches in diameter and 2.4 inches long.

Olympus 50mm f/2.0
Overall Rating: 4 out of 5 stars | Latest Price Info


Expert Reviews

Olympus 50mm f/2.0 Reviews

Whatdigitalcamera.com reviews the Olympus 50mm f/2.0 and writes;
” The MTF charts show very high performance with natural camera sharpening in JPEG, but performance is more on a par with the Pentax lenses in unsharpened RAW mode. Where the lens performs well is in the chromatic aberration area, with low edge-to-centre fringing throughout the lens.”
Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

Photoanswers.co.uk reviews the Olympus 50mm f/2.0 and writes;
“It has a sturdy feel and a metal mount to withstand lots of use and there’s a nice large focus ring, the latter having a positive if slightly grating feel in use and taking a lot of turns to focus from near to far, with the front element extending a long way. AF is quite quick and accurate barring very low-contrast subjects, but does whirr a lot. “
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

Slrgear.com reviews the Olympus 50mm f/2.0 and writes;
“The question for many macro enthusiasts could be whether to buy this lens or the 35mm ƒ/3.5. Optically, the 50mm ƒ/2 is a real treat: images are tack-sharp all the way to ƒ/16, there’s terrific resistance to chromatic aberration, distortion and vignetting, and you get a well-designed, hardy lens made with metal components where you’d need them. The fit and finish, as well as the excellent optical characteristics justify the price, but if you don’t specifically need the 50mm focal length, the 35mm has a higher magnification rating and is just as good optically, so it is a much better value. “
Rating: 4.5 out of 5 stars

Lenstip.com reviews the Olympus 50mm f/2.0 and writes;
“Writing test summaries for such instruments is a sheer pleasure. The ZD 2.0/50 is really optically excellent. One serious reservation concerns the autofocus work. If Olympus in its newest devices maintains the 2.0/50 ED model’s quality of optics and introduces an efficient ultrasonic mechanism, speeding up the autofocus and making it more silent, I won’t find anything to include in the “cons” section… “
rating: N/A

Thewsreviews.com reviews the Olympus 50mm f/2.0 and writes;
“The Olympus 50mm really needs to be considered alongside the 35mm Macro, since the difference between them doesn’t seem that great. The 35mm was the second lens I bought, and it served me well for a long time. Like the 50/2, it’s an exceptional lens: small and sharp, and less expensive than its bigger brother. But lenses cost more because they really are better. “
rating: N/A

Popphoto.com reviews the Olympus 50mm f/2.0 and writes;
“A medium telephoto macro lens in the mold of the famous film-era 90mm f/2 Zuiko macro — which it resembles optically and in price — this lens performs extremely strongly. It’s well-suited to low-light work, portraiture, and, of course, close-ups. Plus, it’s the lightest f/2 true macro we’ve ever seen.”
rating: N/A

Ephotozine.com reviews the Olympus 50mm f/2.0 and writes;
“The optical qualities of this lens are quite good. Controls of chromatic aberrations are some of the best we have seen, with measurements in Imatest being in the tiny fractions of a pixel. Contrast is also fairly good and the colour balance is neutral. As you would expect of a modern prime lens, the control of distortions is also good, with a figure of 0.4% pincushion measured in the distortion module and undetectable by eye. “
rating: N/A

Photozone.de reviews the Olympus 50mm f/2.0 and writes;
” Performance-wise it struggles at f/2 but it’s perfectly usable for portraits due to a very high center performance and a pretty good bokeh (out-of-focus blur). At f/4 and beyond it’s very sharp across the frame… The build quality is just stellar thanks to an all-metal body and super-smooth controls. “
rating: N/A

User Opinions

Olympus 50mm f/2.0 User Reviews

LOVE THIS LENS!!! | Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
“I am a real estate photographer and was considering getting into portraits. After reading all the great reviews decided to go for it. I am so glad I did. My first shoot was a complete success. The agent loved 12 out of 48 photos — which is a great percentage based on her prior experience where the photographer took 150 photos and she only liked 2! I love the blurred background effect. This lens gets my highest recommendation.” – by A Kid’s

Multi-use sharp. | Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
“Very sharp. I don’t really shoot macro so I use it more as a prime 100mm equivelant. Focuses speed is more than acceptable except in dim light. Nice Boken. Highly recommended. “ – by Tanna

A Must Have for Macro & Portrait Needs | Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
“I’ll try to keep this short & sweet. This lens is one of the best lenses to have in your camera bag. I’ve gotten beautifully detailed results. Extremely sharp, I love how much detail I can get of a flower when stopped down to around f6.3-f8. Inversely, I also love the limited depth of field achieved when at that f2 aperture. For doing portraits, this lens is brilliant, it captures much detail. Some people might even complain that it captures too much detail (though if they complain you can always soften this up with software such as Lightroom). I highly recommend this lens to all who are doing portrait & macro photography, as well as those who just want a wonderful lens in general. I’ve used this one my e-520 & e-3 and enjoy it on both. With the E-3, you can take advantage of the dust/splash proof capabilities of the lens/camera combo. “ – by I. Davis

All Good except… | Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
“This is a very good lens. Sharp as a razor images, great. The only thing that kept me from giving five stars is the lens hood. It does not fit well. When compared to my two kit lenses this lens hood which cost $35 to replace is not in the same class. “ – by Gary Stephenson

Just Buy It! | Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
“It is extremely well made. It is solidly built and it focuses smoothly, quickly and quietly on my Olympus E-3 body. The images that I have shot with this lens are razor sharp …… almost too sharp (if there is such a thing) This lens lets in a lot of light at f2.0 and 100iso. You may consider stopping down the aperture or lowering the exposure level for well lit scenes. The depth-of-field is pretty narrow below f8.0 settings. However you will be very happy with the soft bokeh that this lens delivers at the wider f-stop settings. The macro shots are really more like close-ups at 50mm. It’s best to use a macro extension tube such as an Olympus EX-25 Extension Tube for true macro work. You will be very happy with the quick, bright and sharp macro shots that this lens delivers with the extension tube. “ – by David Perez

Sharp Macro Lens, | Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
“It’s a very sharp macro lens. At 50mm (100mm 35mm-equivalent) it’s doubled as a portrait lens. I won’t use it as a landscape lens. At f8, it’s still in macro mode, so if you want more depth of field on a bright day, it may not be the best lens to use. The compact size is a big selling point. The 1:2 magnification ratio (or 1:1 35mm equivalent) is wonderful giving that naked-eye look. When it’s mounted on my E-620, viewfinder is brighter than when 14-54mm II is mounted because of the brighter aperture (f2 vs f2.8). “ – by -Ashi-

Razor sharp but not for beginners | Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
“Unlike the typical kit lens, this lens has a fixed focal length. It also has the possible drawback in that it works best when manually focused. That being said, you won’t find a sharper, faster macro or portrait lens for any camera let alone anything in the Olympus line. If you have a four thirds system camera (Olympus, Leica, etc.) and want to work close, this is well worth the trouble to learn how to use it.” – by Terry Quinn

Magical lens!! | Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
“This lens is very capable of producing artistic pictures that I was not able to get on my kit lens. Color, contrast and depth of field are spot on. This is a lens that I would keep for a very long time.. Good job Olympus! “ – by madc

More user opinions | Write your opinion

Samples

Olympus 50mm f/2.0 Sample Photos

- Olympus 50mm f/2.0 Sample Photos @ Pixel-peeper.com
- Olympus 50mm f/2.0 Sample Photos @ Photographyreview.com
- Olympus 50mm f/2.0 Sample Photos @ Flickr.com
- Olympus 50mm f/2.0 Sample Photos @ Pbase.com
- Olympus 50mm f/2.0 Sample Photos @ Amazon.com

Features & Specifications

Olympus 50mm f/2.0 Specifications

One of the brightest Zuiko digital lenses is the Olympus 50mm f/2.0 medium macro lens. Offering an equivalent to 100mm on a 35mm camera, the lens boasts a maximum magnification ratio of 0.52x along with a minimum focusing distance of 9.45 inches, letting you get nice and close to your subject. The extra-low-dispersion (ED) glass element, meanwhile, reduces chromatic aberrations to deliver superior image quality with high resolution and good contrast. Add an EX-25 extension tube and you can focus to approximately 1x, equivalent to 2x on a 35mm camera. All Olympus lenses carry a one-year warranty.

Specifications

* Focal length: 50mm
* Maximum aperture: f/2.0
* Lens construction: 11 elements in 10 groups, including 1 ED glass element
* Angle of view: 24 degrees
* Closest focusing distance: 9.45 inches
* Maximum image magnification: 0.52x
* Minimum field size: 33.3 x 25mm
* Number of blades: 7
* Minimum aperture: f/22
* Filter size: 52mm
* Tele converter: EC-14
* Extension tube: EX-25
* Lens hood: LH-55
* Lens cap: LC-52
* Lens case: LSC-0814
* Dimensions: 2.8 inches in diameter and 2.4 inches long
* Weight: 10.6 ounces
* Warranty: 1 year